Publication Ethics
Global Journal of Emerging Science, Engineering & Technology (GJESET) is dedicated to following best practices on ethical matters, errors, and retractions. The prevention of publication malpractice is one of the essential responsibilities of the editorial board. Any unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the Editorial Board of this journal does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. Authors submitting articles to the GJESET affirm that manuscript contents are original. The following duties outlined for the editors, reviewers, authors, and publisher are based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) codes of conduct.
DUTIES OF EDITORS
Editors are accountable and responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
Editor should:
- discuss with other editors or reviewers in making decisions;
- evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors;
- not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate;
- ensure a fair and appropriate peer review process;
- unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by anyone who has a view of the manuscript in their research without the express written consent of the author;
- guard the integrity of the published record by issuing corrections and retractions when needed and pursuing suspected or alleged research and publication misconduct.
DUTIES OF REVIEWERS
Reviewers should be kept confidential and treated as privileged information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors.
Reviewers should:
- be conducted objectively. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments;
- identify relevant published work that the authors have not cited. Any statement that had been previously reported elsewhere should be accompanied by the appropriate citation;
- request to the Editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge;
- not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers;
- In case any reviewer feels they can't complete a manuscript review within the stipulated time. The same must be communicated to the editors so that the same can be sent to any other reviewer.
DUTIES OF AUTHORS
Authors should submit papers on work conducted ethically and responsibly, which complies with all relevant legislation.
Authors should:
- present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation;
- endeavor to describe their methods clearly and unambiguously so that others can confirm their findings;
- adhere to publication requirements that submitted work is original, is not plagiarized, and has not been published elsewhere;
- certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere;
- ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and words of others, this must be appropriately cited;
- take collective responsibility for submitted and published work;
- ensure the paper contains sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Duplicitous or expressively inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
- ensure proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work;
- ensure that the authorship accurately reflects individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting; and where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged;
- disclose relevant funding sources and any existing or potential conflicts of interest. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed;
- discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their own published work; the author must promptly notify the journal editors and the editor to retract or correct the paper.