Beyond Formal Parks: Youth Preferences and Experiential Quality in Informal Public Spaces
Main Article Content
Abstract
Urban development encompasses not only physical infrastructure but also the social dynamics that shape everyday urban life, with public spaces playing a crucial role in supporting interaction and community activities. However, informal public spaces remain relatively underexplored in urban research, particularly regarding young people’s preferences. This study aims to analyze youth preferences toward informal public spaces and identify the key factors influencing those preferences. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed in selected urban areas of Samarinda City, Indonesia. Data were collected through structured questionnaires from 150 university students aged 18 to 23 years who actively use informal public spaces. Youth preference was treated as the dependent variable, while accessibility, comfort, facilities, safety, location conditions, spatial flexibility, visual attractiveness, and place attachment were examined as independent variables. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis. The results show that the regression model explains 53.6% of the variance in youth preferences. Visual attractiveness emerged as the strongest and statistically significant positive predictor, whereas location conditions demonstrated a significant negative effect. Other variables showed positive but statistically insignificant relationships, and comfort was excluded from the final model due to multicollinearity. These findings suggest that experiential and contextual qualities appear to play a more prominent role than purely functional attributes in shaping youth engagement with informal public spaces, highlighting the importance of aesthetic and environmental considerations in people-centered urban planning.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Batty, M. (2021). Inventing Future Cities. MIT Press.
Carmona, M., & Tiesdell, S. (2021). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Franck, K. A., & Stevens, Q. (2021). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. Routledge.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press.
Gehl, J. (2022). Life between buildings: Using public space (7th ed.). Island Press.
Honey-Rosés, J., et al. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on public space: A review of the emerging questions. Cities & Health, 5(S1), S263–S279. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House.
Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Wu, F., & Liu, Y. (2022). Youth activities and informal public spaces: Social interaction and place experience in urban environments. Urban Studies, 59(9), 1821–1838. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211030215
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2012). Addressing Transit Crime through Environmental Design. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Criminology.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2023). Urban design and public space: Social dimensions. Routledge.
Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88.
Mehta, V. (2021). The street: A quintessential social public space. Routledge Handbook of Urban Design, 463–475.
Miles, M., & Hall, T. (2021). The city cultures reader (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Németh, J., & Schmidt, S. (2021). Toward a methodology for measuring the security of publicly accessible spaces. Journal of Urban Design, 26(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1849562
Project for Public Spaces. (2007). How to Turn a Place Around: A Handbook for Creating Successful Public Spaces. PPS.
Putra, A. B., & Setiawan, B. (2022). Informal public spaces and youth social life in secondary cities of Indonesia. Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2), 101–115.
Rahman, F., & Salim, A. (2023). Youth preferences for informal public spaces in non-metropolitan urban contexts. Journal of Asian Urban Studies, 7(1), 45–58.
Relph, E. (2022). Place and placelessness (2nd ed.). Pion.
Thomas, N., & Bertolini, L. (2022). Young People’s Use of Public Space: A Review. Urban Studies (or relevant journal as per the author's specific source).
UN-Habitat. (2022). Global public space toolkit: From global principles to local policies and practice. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Conservation Foundation.